To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.mediawatchOpen lugnet.mediawatch in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 MediaWatch / 496
495  |  497
Subject: 
Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002
Date: 
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:53:50 GMT
Viewed: 
53 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Jason Cicchini writes:
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
In lugnet.castle, Jason Cicchini writes:
What was TLC thinking?? They made a classic comic book villain look like a
football mascot!

Since the Spiderman sets are based on the upcomig movie and not the comic,
you'll want to direct your complaints there, rather than at Lego.

Jeff

I realize this, however TLC is responsibe for the Lego sets of the movie,
therefore my complaints are directed correctly. I'm sure Sony Entertainment
didn't say "Could you make Green Goblin's head three times the size of his
body? Thanks." Besides, I've seen pics of what the Green goblin looks like
in the movie, and I'm glad to report that on screen his head is correctly
proportioned.
I'm sorry, but give me the HP goblin heads over that crap anyday.

It isn't "three times the size of his body."  I'd say it is little more than
20% larger than a regular minifig head.  I can't comment on how it looks
compared to either the movie or the comic, since I have seen neither, nor do I
plan to.  However, the head *obviously* was acceptable to Sony/Marvel/whoever,
as it made it into production.

Anyway, I can see some uses for the head, and thats all that matters to me.

Jeff



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
 
(...) Okay, a little follow-up: A friend showed me a pic, and the minifig head looks like a pretty good representation of the character's head. Is it a bit wide? Sure, but minifigs THEMSELVES are a bit wide. Jeff (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
 
(...) I realize this, however TLC is responsibe for the Lego sets of the movie, therefore my complaints are directed correctly. I'm sure Sony Entertainment didn't say "Could you make Green Goblin's head three times the size of his body? Thanks." (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)

33 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR