 | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —Mark Neumann
|
| | | (...) .... (...) Your opinion, and entitled to it, however it is also your choice to participate. Or to allow those you are responsible for knowing whether they should participate. (...) I think Lego was right in making a statement, however I think (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Mark, you are taking my "rant" a little out of context. Assuming you are an adult, I couldn't care less about what you watch-- my concern is protecting children from unsuitable material. It is our *duty* as adults in a civilized society to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | | | That is my right, my privalidge. (...) I'm sorry if I insulted you, really I was trying to make a point with a message that embodied what I feared. I actually looked at a number of messages, saw a pattern and had to speak my truth. First, I don't (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) require (...) Wait a minute! Kissing is (or often is) sexual. When twelve year olds hold hands at the mall, that's sexual too. Sexual describes a huge range of behaviors, the vast majority of which are healthy. Why should age verification take (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | (...) Read that again, "explicit sexual content" Explicit; that means clearly defined. In this case the sexual act itself which is what we are discussing. Age verification has become somewhat standardized across the internet. (some of it by law, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
