 | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —William R. Ward
|
| | | (...) There is nothing wrong with making gay minifigs, any more than there is with making heterosexual minifigs. Sexual content may be inappropriate for kids, but a pair of gay minifigs doing non-sexual things (like simply living together, or (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —Ross McCullough
|
| | | | (...) I disagree. To me, the Lego minifig as always been aracial. Yes, it tends to have the physical characteristics of a caucasian, but it is not hard to take the same skin tone and change the features and come up with a black guy. (I think this (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms" —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) A man and a woman who come with two kids isn't an expressly heterosexual couple? What would they have to do be so? Chris (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
