 | | Re: Lego article on slashDot
|
|
this topic needs a place on the main page of lugnet, or "attention points" or whatever it is that decides that. (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego article on slashDot
|
|
(...) Forget the Slashdot commentary... go right to the Fast Company article. This is a very insightful and interesting piece. I think anyone really interested in the LEGO company, where it's been and where it's going, should read this article. It (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch) !
|
| |
| | Lego article on slashDot
|
|
Lego article on slashDot titled 'Why Can't LEGO Click?' at ... (URL) which in turn references an article at fastcompany .. (URL) some nice historical notes on TLC Ray (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch) !!
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO in Washington Post
|
|
(...) Observer. (23 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO in Washington Post
|
|
Despite LEGO® releasing the new classic and legend sets, I can't help but feel that they are continuing to slip away from their winning formula used from the beginning. The Bionicle stuff is total limitation on one's creativity (at least in my (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
