 | | Re: Lego article on slashDot —Allan Bedford
|
| | | (...) Forget the Slashdot commentary... go right to the Fast Company article. This is a very insightful and interesting piece. I think anyone really interested in the LEGO company, where it's been and where it's going, should read this article. It (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego article on slashDot —David Perry
|
| | | | | this topic needs a place on the main page of lugnet, or "attention points" or whatever it is that decides that. (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego article on slashDot —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Members signed in via the web interface decide that, in part, by their highlighting it. If you think it does, do that. I think the original article reference got highlighted fairly high... (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego article on slashDot —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | (...) LEGO® needs that 'Eye of the Tiger' again...-Harvey (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
