| | Re: LEGO Group and Disney Announce Strategic Licensing Relationship for 2010 Dave Schuler
| | | (...) For real? I mainly follow the micro-scale Mega Bloks, so the comings and goings of the other scales don't really hit my radar. Do you have a citation for that Pooh info? This is the first I've heard of it. Dave! (16 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.disney)
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Group and Disney Announce Strategic Licensing Relationship for 2010 David Laswell
| | | | | (...) I'm not having any luck pulling up any direct proof of it (most of the legit news source pages have expired, and all that's really left are Wikipedia and a handful of blogs that only hint at the LEGO/Disney/Pooh aspect), but here's the gist of (...) (16 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.disney)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Group and Disney Announce Strategic Licensing Relationship for 2010 Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Whoa, that's convoluted--thanks for dredging it all up for me. I confess now that I'd had a little brain-fart; I totally forgot that LEGO put out Disney/Pooh sets a few years back. I could only remember as far back as the Mega Bloks (...) (16 years ago, 19-Feb-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.disney)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Group and Disney Announce Strategic Licensing Relationship for 2010 David Laswell
| | | | | (...) It's entirely possible. Since Mickey and Pooh came out at the same time (apparently for both lines), Disney probably bundled them together into a single license. When the Pooh license issue came up, the entire deal might have fallen through (...) (16 years ago, 19-Feb-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.disney)
| | | | | | |