 | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) There's the exact same technical/legalistic rule against saying "Fords" or "Toyotas" or "Burger Kings" or "Pentiums" or "Dells" or "Dumpsters". Or "Kleenexes" or "Band-Aids". Again as the original article pointed out. :) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Well, sure. But the original article was *days* ago--my mayfly attention span hardly let's get to the end of (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well, there are two things a play here... what people(1) *want* to do, and what companies *have* to do if they want to preserve their property. It is my opinion that The LEGO Company *has* to ask people to use the word "LEGO" as an adjective (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Yes, that's a very well-grounded opinion. :) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
