|
|
 | | Re: BrickiWiki
|
| (...) Unless someone else has taken to being you, you seem to have got at least the basics right ;) I noticed your edit the other day. A good place to start with BrickWiki is probably the (URL) FAQ>. Tim PS. It has come to my attention that the (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Re: BrickiWiki
|
| Another fan effort that needs more publicity is (URL) Wiki-Brick-Links> by Klas Schöldström. This is simply a fan-updatable link database using the wiki format. Ultimately an interactive site is the only solution to the constant problem of outdated (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Re: BrickiWiki
|
| (...) I concur wholeheartedly. On principle I personally will never use it, and I would encourage all other AFOLs to avoid it as well, sticking to the homegrown original (URL) Brickwiki>. In fact, I think that there should be a frontpage link on (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Re: BrickiWiki
|
| (...) Also announced (URL) here>. IMO this is not a legitimate effort but is an attachment. (URL) Brickwiki> (no extra i) has been around for quite some time, is quite comprehensive and is most definitely an AFOL effort. To be honest, I'm really (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | BrickiWiki
|
| This link arrived in my mailbox this morning courtesy of Google Alerts: (URL) this a legitamate AFOL effort or a company attaching itself to the LEGO brand? -- Bryan (19 years ago, 17-May-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
|
