Subject:
|
Re: TRU.com Xmas fiasco
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.shopping
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:42:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
515 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.shopping, Thomas Main writes:
> Doug Finney wrote:
> > Did anyone here who received compensation from TRU.com for their late-for-
> > Christmas delivery get less than $100 in Geoffery dollars? I was talking to
> > someone in a non-Lego forum who only received $25. I'm just wondering if it
> > had anything to do with size of order, date of order, etc.
>
> I did not get a small order ($20) placed 11/2?/99 until sometime in
> January and they gave me $25.00 (still haven't used), which I thought
> was more than nice of them. I hope they start delivering better
> service, though.
> >
> > Also, any word on the possible lawsuit? I still think that's ridiculous but
> > am curious to see if anything comes of it.
>
> I would hope any lawsuit brought against them would be thrown out.
Hmm. Iwould hope that any lawsuit brought against them would go through, and
be enough of a penalty to set a precedent. It might actually prompt other
companies going online to put some time and effort into making sure their
ecommerce setup is adequate FIRST.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: TRU.com Xmas fiasco
|
| (...) I did not get a small order ($20) placed 11/2?/99 until sometime in January and they gave me $25.00 (still haven't used), which I thought was more than nice of them. I hope they start delivering better service, though. (...) I would hope any (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
