 | | Re: Calling for Box Status and New Rule to vote on —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) OOOOhhh.. I like that idea! (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Calling for Box Status and New Rule to vote on —Will Hess
|
| | | | | (...) As one who has been on the lists for a few months without seeing a single box I DON'T like that idea. Waiting is bad enough...to now require those of us who have been patient thus far to constantly monitor another newsgroup just to say we want (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | RE: Calling for Box Status and New Rule to vote on —Doug Finney
|
| | | | | | (...) That's exactly why I said it's not a perfect solution. But take GB#4 for example. (It's not lost is it?) I think there's only one person on that list who hasn't already received at least one box. Knock everyone else off that list (including (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Calling for Box Status and New Rule to vote on —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I like the idea so long as there is some mechanism which makes sure that those who don't sit glued to their computer all day will get a decent chance to receive a box, and even better, something that makes sure there is a good flow (i.e. if (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
