 | | Re: Does this seem right? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) ??? Um, it DIDN'T go for that price. It was a reserve that wasn't met. Dunno what Scott A and Shiri are getting on about. ++Lar (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does this seem right? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) I did not notice that. (...) I'd still expect it to do better than $17.50 - would you not? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does this seem right? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. However in this case I think Shiri is spot on. Not a very well publicised auction, not in the US, seller not very highly rated, all those are factors that may have held back bidders. (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Does this seem right? —Eric Brouwer
|
| | | | | I think that's part of their point. They're suprised it did not go for more. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Does this seem right? —Adam Hoekwater
|
| | | | (...) Thank you, Larry. That was the whole gist of my post. It didn't go because the reserve was not met. But why not? Shouldn't there have been a feeding frenzy on this thing? -Adam 8^D (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | |
