Subject:
|
Re: Modern Auction 7 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 00:08:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2378 times
|
| |
|
|
I thought about it, and now I am confused. I guess there isn't much difference
between like-new, and almost like-new.
But like-new would be better than almost like-new. It's almost like-new, but
not quite.
I guess what I mean by like-new is that it's basically in brand new condition,
but I can't say that because it has been built and touched.
I'll try to clear it up in the auction notes.
Matthew
>
> > Mint =new and unopened b= box included
> > aL-N =almost like-new *= see notes at bottom
> > L-N =like-new
> > EX =excellent condition
> > G =good condition
>
> I'm confused by the order. Except for aL-N, these are in descending order. So
> is aL-N better than L-N (implied by position, but not by "almost") or worse (in
> which case it's out of order)? (2)
>
> As for the auction itself, there are some nice sets here, at attractive prices.
>
> 1 - I'd say "not to be picky, but.." but I *AM* being picky here.:-)
>
> 2 - Slightly out of order lists just drive me crazy... Chaos is cool, and order
> is OK but almost... :-)
>
> ++Lar
>
> ======== Posted via the LUGNET discussion group web interface ========
> http://www.lugnet.com/news/ Search, Read, Post, or Watch Traffic
======== Posted via the LUGNET discussion group web interface ========
http://www.lugnet.com/news/ Search, Read, Post, or Watch Traffic
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Modern Auction 7 Update
|
| "Matthew B" <mbrown@islandnet.com> writes: (1) (...) I'm confused by the order. Except for aL-N, these are in descending order. So is aL-N better than L-N (implied by position, but not by "almost") or worse (in which case it's out of order)? (2) As (...) (28 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
