| |
In lugnet.loc.us.ks, Gerhard R. Istok wrote:
> My whole take on this is that it is NOT Lego driven, but developer driven. If
> it goes thru, then the taxpayers of Kansas will be paying for this.
I agree with you, but as long as Legoland is not owned by Lego, it is an
amusement park like any other, and developers are going to use it as the draw
for retail, hotels, other tourism, etc. and since it will increace the tax base
enormously, the developers will expect taxpayers to pick up the tab.This should
not come as a surprise, since any Legoland not located in one of the major USA
metropolis (something that would cost exponentially more than the KS deal) is
going to have to come as a package deal with the above mentioned types of
entities to make it a success.
I applaud Legoland parks for using creative financing to bring parks where the
might not otherwise be located.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
