| |
Once upon a time, jgowell@umich.edu (James Gowell) wrote:
> In article <36111804.2662005@lugnet.com>, blisses@worldnet.att.net says...
> >
> > Do we really need 4 ng for Michigan?
> >
> > Unless/until traffic reaches reasonably high levels, why not
> > consolidate? If something really super-cool happens in Detroit, I
> > might be willing to drive over. So I'm reasonably interested in
> > loc.us.mi.det. Ditto for loc.us.mi.lan and loc.us.mi.fli.
> >
> > Steve
>
> Well, as the other groups are empty except for the openning posts, lets use
> GRR as the main meeting point for now. How about posting your message into
> those groups so people know to come over here.
I'll just cross-post this reply to the Michigan groups.
I caught something Todd said about the state-level in the loc.us.*
hierarchy. Basically, it's just there as a convenience for tracking
down specific city-groups. Interesting. Which makes sense, since I'm
as interested in what happens in Chicago as I am in Detroit
activities. Except for the pesky Indiana-state border guards.
> BTW, I'm in the Ann Arbor area, my parents are in the Lansing area. Together
> we can scour the State's Meijers, Targets, K-Marts and Wal Marts.
Hmm. I wonder what kind of response you'd get if you posted a
"Willing to buy used LEGO" ad around UM.
Steve
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
