| |
In lugnet.loc.us.il, Eric Kingsley writes:
> Congrats Folks, I will put you in the queue for the LUGMAP (along with about >6 other groups, sorry folks I've been busy).
Cool, thanks.
> I was just wondering why you all decided to go LTC and not LUG? Nothing wrong
> with that of course but Tim, you don't strike me as a train head. I would >have thought you would have gone the LUG route.
Well, we went that because in Ondrew's and my discussion, that was the
focus. I asked him if he wanted a LUG or an LTC, he said LTC. That's fine
with me, plus, I think an LTC would bring the current people I know in the
area together quicker - there's a small handful of traniacs here.
I am a trainhead, just in a train dark ages of sorts. When I was little it
was trains and LEGO, well, the LEGO won out and I never could afford LEGO
trains. I'll definitely still do the space LEGO thing, but I can do this as
well. Plus, I believe strongly in LTCs and how they help grow the LEGO
community.
We'll have a LUG in the near future too, I hope.
> Just interested. Best of luck with the group.
Thanks.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
