Subject:
|
Re: proposal: sever lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf and ba-lego mailing list
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Feb 2000 23:07:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
656 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
> Now that
Well, actually, this is precisely how the gateway was created, back in
November of 1998. In other words, it's because the lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
group is subscribable by email that the message exchange is possible.
> you can get Lugnet newsgroup messages by email
> is there any need to forward messages between lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
> and ba-lego? I think the two forums can have different uses.
> Ba-lego should be local news that is not appropriate to
> post to the whole world. lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf is appropriate
> for messages that are appropriate to post to the whole world.
>
> I think part of the problem with lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
> being connected with ba-lego is the
> "recent messages from all newsgroups" feature on the middle
> right side of the main LUGNET page. There have been a few
> drive-by replies that I did not think were appropriate
> and would not have happened without that feature.
>
> I propose to sever that connection. Is there any support
> at all for this proposal? If I get some support, I'll
> call for votes. Any opinions?
I support severing the link. If you do call for votes, I would recommend
that the default answer (if someone does not vote) is -not- to keep the
exchange. But it's really up to the ba-lego@cinnamon.com listowner, not a
vote.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
