(...) No <set:6929> then? Shame. Because then you can do 6880+6929=1593 like mine - though you do need a few extra pieces... hmm... Jason J Railton (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
(...) Actually, it's a good thing that some people are bringing some 6880's and 6929's - I have visions of a table consisting of ten 1593's and no 6880's and 6929's... Steve Burge (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
