To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.ukOpen lugnet.loc.uk in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / United Kingdom / 4285
4284  |  4286
Subject: 
J-Box 3 degradation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.uk
Date: 
Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:47:46 GMT
Viewed: 
436 times
  
I was quite surprised at how quickly the Minifig J-Box (#3) has accumulated
damaged, worn and chewed parts, although I was pleased to see how it had grown
in size since I last saw it. I have separated out the absolute _junk_ and also
divided up the remaining into 1) _more or less complete_ matched minifigs, 2)
unmatched spare body parts, 3) head/neck-wear and 4) miscellaneous tools and
artifacts, but there are still some mildly damaged (rarer) parts left in. As I
feared there is now a definite shortage of heads and hands, but I have tried to
make up for this with what I put in.

Should I leave the _junk_ in - it is only 35g out of a total weight of 500g
excluding packaging or leave it for Huw to remove, as he started the box and is
next on list?

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: J-Box 3 degradation
 
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FxABzM.Izz@lugnet.com... (...) 500g (...) and is (...) I should ditch it to save me the trouble. Huw (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR