Subject:
|
Re: 2000 Set Observations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 13:27:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
272 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Mark Herzberg <carorvan@aol.com> wrote in message
news:FnIu6v.H1C@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Scott Arthur writes:
> > 2. The larger town and arctic sets look to be poor value for money (nothing
> > new there).
>
> Town? Yes. Artic? I have to disagree with you. There is very little
> simplification. However, I am comparing with US prices. In the US, the big
> Artic set is $60.
Here it is GBP40, so its about the same.
Huw
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 2000 Set Observations
|
| (...) Town? Yes. Artic? I have to disagree with you. There is very little simplification. However, I am comparing with US prices. In the US, the big Artic set is $60. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![2000 Set Observations -Scott Arthur (29-Dec-99 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 2000 Set Observations -Huw Millington (29-Dec-99 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 2000 Set Observations -Mark Herzberg (29-Dec-99 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|