 | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Ross Crawford
|
| | | x-posted to lugnet.reviews 8?) (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah, crazy Kerry should have done this to begin with... ...what a nut to have compared these two sets anyway! As if these sets even came close to one another. I built and returned a 6091 that was missing some pieces (the earliest sets in the (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | | (...) A nut? There exists a long tradition of proving that old is better than new... (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) So, you bought it, built it (& discovered missing parts), modified it, displayed it (for a week), let other people play (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, I only buy if I think it's worth it now. That set taught me a lego lesson about quality. At $90 USD, the set did not contain the needed quality. But I probably would not have returned it except for the missing pieces, which gave me an (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Kerry Raymond
|
| | | | | | (...) it would (...) Actually I did buy my 6091 at half price! I had resisted it at full-price because I didn't think it was worth the money. Besides which, at half-price, it was less than AUD100, which is a psychological barrier for me. (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —James Ng
|
| | | | | | Hi, Considering I bought my 6098/6091 at half price, I am still dispointed despite the save, the set it poorly structured and when trying to see its features I always seem to knock of half the castle, It is very unstable also, making it even worse, (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Kerry Raymond
|
| | | | (...) Why bother? All you get is abuse if you do. I observe that in the opinion of Richard Marchetti, I am a "nut" for having the audacity to compare the two sets. At least if you post reviews in loc.au, you don't get abused for having written it. (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) I've kind of noticed this trend over the last 6-12 months, and I'm not sure if I'm alarmed by it or not... More and more I'll find very interesting posts in the lugnet.loc.* and lugnet.org.* groups that really "belong" (or I should say "would (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Actually, I also called you "crazy Kerry" -- but I meant it in a friendly way. I call everyone here a "lugnut" including myself (for reasons that should be obvious). If you buy lego as an adult I should think being called a "nut" is just par (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Then let 'em come & abuse me for such unnecessary cross-posting 8?) (...) And I didn't thank you for the review either! ROSCO (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| | | | |
