To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 7151
7150  |  7152
Subject: 
Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews
Followup-To: 
lugnet.reviews
Date: 
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:16:47 GMT
Viewed: 
5038 times
  
x-posted to lugnet.reviews 8?)

In lugnet.loc.au, Kerry Raymond writes:
> I just finished building the 6085 Black Monarch's Castle and I was most
> impressed. This is an older set (1988) that I got on ebay and was definitely
> worth getting. I'm surprised it doesn't get more rave reviews in the notes
> on lugnet:
> 
> http://guide.lugnet.com/set/6085
> 
> I also recently built a contemporary castle 6091 King Leo's Breezeway (as
> someone so aptly named it):
> 
> http://guide.lugnet.com/set/6091
> 
> and the two are now sitting side by side on my dining room table. It's
> interesting to compare them.
> 
> Superficially King Leo's looks bigger than the Black Monarch's being about
> 50% taller, 50% wider, and a bit deeper. However, much of this volume is
> achieved by the use of a fairly high baseplate, whereas the Black Monarch is
> built on thin baseboards. On piece count, the Black Monarch is the larger:
> 665 pieces compared with 524 pieces for King Leo's. The Black Monarch also
> has a lot of castle wall pieces, more than King Leo's.  So where are all the
> pieces going in the Black Monarch? Answer: into solid walls. Because King
> Leo's relies on the baseplate to provide the hard-to-scale slopes to keep
> the bad guys out, the upper structure is built in a very open style (hence
> the "Breezeway" nickname). The Black Monarch uses a lot of bricks to create
> a very solid no-bad-dudes-get-through sets of external walls and towers.
> 
> As probably comes as no surprise to anyone, the older Black Monarch uses a
> lot more standard parts (well, if you count castle walls as standard)
> compared with the newer King Leo's. For example, the portcullis in King
> Leo's is a single piece, whereas you make it up with plates in the Black
> Monarch. King Leo's has a stained glass window etc.
> 
> In terms of looks, King Leo's is more of your fairytale castle whereas the
> Black Monarch has more of a Norman Castle appearance. The Black Monarch is a
> strictly two-tone structure (light grey and black), with the colours coming
> from the "accessories": red and blue flags, red and blue shields, and the
> minifigs and horses. King Leo's is a much more confused colour scheme: green
> base plate with a mostly light grey superstructure, interspersed somewhat
> randomly with black, brown, dark grey, and sand, topped off with mid-blue
> turret towers and some blue flags. The grey on King Leo's just doesn't look
> right for me. I think a fairytale castle should probably have used a lot
> more lighter colours in the main structure (especially the upper parts),
> e.g. white, sand, yellow. I don't think the light grey and blue turrets work
> well together at all.
> 
> King Leo's is a strictly look-from-the-front castle. The Black Monarch is
> defended on all sides, although it is designed with hinges and baseplates so
> that it can open out the 2 rear sections to make a very wide
> view-from-front-only castle; a nice piece of design. King Leo's does not
> open out, but instead has a number of moving parts: a trebuchet to chuck
> rocks, a chest that flies off when you hit at the right spot, a trap with
> some falling axes etc. I think this is catering more to the modern
> short-attention-span child who expects an action-response sequence (press a
> button and something happens).
> 
> Summary. Overall, I definitely prefer the older Black Monarch. I like the
> more substantive castle look with the more limited selection  (much more
> real IMHO); I like the use of more standard parts; I like the opening-out
> design. I hope Lego re-releases a lot more of these older sets as
> "classics", as I definitely like them a lot more than some of the more
> recent offerings.
> 
> Kerry
> 
> --
> ============
> Kerry Raymond
> kerry@dstc.edu.au
> Proud to be LUGNET Member 599
> www.lugnet.com/people/members/?m=599



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
 
(...) Yeah, crazy Kerry should have done this to begin with... ...what a nut to have compared these two sets anyway! As if these sets even came close to one another. I built and returned a 6091 that was missing some pieces (the earliest sets in the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
  Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
 
(...) Why bother? All you get is abuse if you do. I observe that in the opinion of Richard Marchetti, I am a "nut" for having the audacity to compare the two sets. At least if you post reviews in loc.au, you don't get abused for having written it. (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)

Message is in Reply To:
  6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
 
I just finished building the 6085 Black Monarch's Castle and I was most impressed. This is an older set (1988) that I got on ebay and was definitely worth getting. I'm surprised it doesn't get more rave reviews in the notes on lugnet: (URL) also (...) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.au)  

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR