To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 5611
5610  |  5612
Subject: 
Re: mech legalities
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.au
Followup-To: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Thu, 10 May 2001 20:31:24 GMT
Viewed: 
427 times
  
I think you closer to the truth when you state that 'mech' and 'mecha' have
become umbrella terms for the genré. Anyone can use them without
possiblility of repercussions.

BTW, below is the US Copyright Office entry for Mechwarrior:

TX-3-626-452                 (COHM)        ITEM 1 OF 5 IN SET 1
TITL: Mechwarrior : the BattleTech role playing game.
PHYS: 144 p.
CLNA: acFASA Corporation
DCRE: 1986           DPUB: 1Aug86           DREG: 13Aug93
LINM: NM: new text & artwork.
ECIF: 1/B///A

Matt

In lugnet.loc.au, Zac Soden writes:
I was looking at the new life on mars sets today and I noticed that the word
mech is used in the name "Recon Mech". I had always thought that mech was a
copyrighted word owned by FASA and whatever company currently owns the
rights to mechwarrior.
It's funny though because mech has pretty much become the standard word for
battle robots nowadays....


Any ideas?

zSoden



Message is in Reply To:
  mech legalities
 
I was looking at the new life on mars sets today and I noticed that the word mech is used in the name "Recon Mech". I had always thought that mech was a copyrighted word owned by FASA and whatever company currently owns the rights to mechwarrior. (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.loc.au)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR