To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 4683
4682  |  4684
Subject: 
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.loc.au
Date: 
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 03:31:26 GMT
Viewed: 
28 times
  
Dave Low <stinglessbee@hotSPAMFREEmail.com> wrote in message
news:G9t0tt.5BE@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Ross Crawford writes:
Currently we (.loc.au) can't post in the state level groups • (.loc.au.vic),
only in specific city groups (.loc.au.vic.mel) which are pretty much • 1 per
state ATM anyway. And not many people currently post there anyway. I • think
it'd be good to keep the state groups, certainly don't need city
level. >> > Even  if we get our LUGs in the .org hierarchy (below), I think
we still >> >need state groups in .loc for non-organisation local state
stuff.

So you're saying?--deleting the super-lower-level metro groups in • .loc.au
would be (possibly) a step forward but deleting the state-level groups
loc.au.xxx would be a step backward?

yep, basically I think that would work well _with .loc.au_ other • countries
may vary.

I agree with Ross. Archive all sub-state groups, retain loc.au.xxx
(state-level groups), allow posting at state-level groups (for "who's
booking the meeting hall?" type questions). .org.au seems to be working • okay
for organisation/market discussions.

Other thoughts?

I was thinking of the state level for more non-organisation type stuff, like
"Fred's toys in Smith St has XXXX set for $20" stuff. If it's likely to be
of interest to anyone outside the state, cross-post to .loc.au. The state
groups would probably be fairly low-traffic (as they are currently).

I would see "who's booking the meeting hall?" going in the org.au.MUG (or
whatever) group, as this is more organisation related. Of course, if it's
not a user-group meeting, the .loc.au.xxx group would be more appropriate.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
 
(...) I agree with Ross. Archive all sub-state groups, retain loc.au.xxx (state-level groups), allow posting at state-level groups (for "who's booking the meeting hall?" type questions). .org.au seems to be working okay for organisation/market (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.loc.au)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR