Subject:
|
Re: 21 Australians
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 01:03:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
589 times
|
| |
|
|
Peter White wrote in message ...
> We're up to 21 official Lugnet members now with Darren and Frances • officially
> clocked in. With Lugnet's newish front page, the stream of new members • seems
> fairly constant. I wonder who will be member 666 ?
Feh! When I applied for membership I effectively requested 666.
For "Membership number range[s] you wish to exclude:"
I specified: "[1-665,667-1000000]"
But no, LUGNET wouldn't play ball... so I'll be a bit miffed if they hand it
to anyone else ;-)
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164 (wanted to be 666!)
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 21 Australians
|
| (...) I wished I had, AFTER having my number allotted. But I'm glad I didn't ... now. I wonder how many others have requested 666. pete.w (member (666 divided by 2, then 11 subtracted)) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 21 Australians
|
| We're up to 21 official Lugnet members now with Darren and Frances officially clocked in. With Lugnet's newish front page, the stream of new members seems fairly constant. I wonder who will be member 666 ? Todd and Suzanne continue to improve the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
