 | | I had to do it!!!
|
| Am I post #10,000??? :)))) Mel (22 years ago, 29-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I had to do it!!!
|
| (...) Well done! Make sure you note that as a claim to fame in the next Roll Call update. And for those keeping track (and there's got to be at least two besides me...), a total of 10,772 posts to .loc.au (before my last one, and this one), puts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I had to do it!!!
|
| (...) Your post was 10002, where are the other 770 ? Thanks! (22 years ago, 29-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I had to do it!!!
|
| (...) (Ticks off first of the other two). In groups below .loc.au in the heirarchy. I checked the numbers at (URL) may be that I should have said .loc.au.*, but if we discount groups further down the heirarchy, then I think .loc.au can rightfully (...) (22 years ago, 29-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I had to do it!!!
|
| (...) Bzzzt. I'm not "keeping track" I'm just trying to spot inconsistencies... not this time, makes sense. (22 years ago, 29-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I had to do it!!!
|
| (...) Presumably the anticipated number of replies to this discussion about whether it's 10002 or 10772 :-) Kerry (22 years ago, 29-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I had to do it!!!
|
| (...) Hmmm... unintended pun there... (...) Apologies for my cynicism. (...) Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| |
