|
|
 | | Re: Shell Lego promo sets
|
| On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 Jamie Obrien wrote: ---- (...) ---- Yes, I could pick up some minifigs that way, but I thought that it might be better to swap them for the sets. That way get some figs, and I also get the element of surprise when I see what you (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
| | | | | Re: Kev are you there? (was: G'day from CANADA)
|
| (...) Hope you took a couple of extra suitcases 8?) BTW, I assume you've seen this (URL) - wish I could visit... Regards, ROSCO (25 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Yay for Duplo Trains!!
|
| Dave Low wrote in message ... (...) Crossing>. (...) The construction site had both of these sets last year. You may need to email them as they don't always list all their sets on their website. (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.duplo)
| | | | | Re: When is Lego actually considered old?
|
| (...) When I look at a bunch of older pieces, I can see subtle differences. The older pieces don't hold together as strongly, although I'm not sure if that's an effect of age or just better design and tighter manufacturing tolerances of the newer (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: When is Lego actually considered old?
|
| (...) production). While it's true that we can put a date on sets, it's presumably a lot harder to put a date on pieces. Would it be possible to distinguish between a box of assorted bricks from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, or 00s? Obviously some pieces (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
