 | | Re: M>ltc displays at Pakenham Model show
|
| (...) And I did! Looks good, some great buildings and some great scenes. Looks like you lot had fun. You've given us (BLTG) some good ideas for our own layout. Well Done Gary (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.trains.org.mltc, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Lego Track!
|
| (...) It's called bread and butter marketing. Keep producing the goods that pay the rent, expand on them if your gaurenteed sales. They pay for themselves and help pay the rent. That way you can then venture out and try other things that are unknown (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: New Lego Track!
|
| (...) That's my point, maybe one posting every few years doesn't really constitute a real need to TLG, they might need a more blatant approach. (...) If they would of put that money into new track geometry they probably would recouped their costs, (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Lego Track!
|
| (...) Too true Gary (...) Silly is perhaps not strong enough (try stupid) They have not seen the potential that we see at train shows from the true hobbiests that would like to try it. I am sure that the same thing ould be said in the USA. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: New Lego Track!
|
| "John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:IGJnyJ.1rEv@lugnet.com... (...) idea (...) from LEGO (...) sounds (...) to run (...) I agree. The idea is good, but the problem is simple - the market is narrow for these. Yes we would buy it, but just (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
