 | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —David Laswell
| | | | (...) I agree that this image should not have been included on the box...but for an entirely different reason. Look at the set very closely. You've got the Riddler, and a cell for the Riddler. You've got Poison Ivy, and a cell for Poison Ivy. You've (...) (17 years ago, 4-Jun-07, to lugnet.licensed.batman, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —Dave Schuler
| | | | | | (...) Wow--all else being equal, that's a fantastic piece of analysis. Nicely done! Dave! (17 years ago, 6-Jun-07, to lugnet.licensed.batman, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) What, the Scarecrow can't have henchmen? You can't run a supervillain lockup single-handedly. Not if you want to do a good job of it... Steve (17 years ago, 6-Jun-07, to lugnet.licensed.batman, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —David Laswell
| | | | | (...) Of course he can have henchmen, but there's a clear pattern of having the henchmen dress in such a way as to make their employer more-or-less identifiable. Joker's guy has a dark-purple shirt, Two-Face's guy has a white/black shirt, and Mr. (...) (17 years ago, 6-Jun-07, to lugnet.licensed.batman, FTX)
| | | | | | |
