 | | Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Tim David
|
| | | (Picture deleted by request of holder of rights (copyright violation)) Do we need a lugnet.licensed.indiana ? (17 years ago, 12-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.announce, lugnet.year.2008, FTX) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Brian Davis
|
| | | | | (...) No. Indiana is a very powerful state in terms of LEGO use, but we're not (yet!) powerful enough to license our state name. Thanks for asking! (17 years ago, 12-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, lugnet.loc.us.in.ind, lugnet.org.us.laflrc, lugnet.org.us.indylug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Will Chapman
|
| | | | | (...) Wow, that was fast. Admins (and/or Moderators), you may as well just delete or lock the whole thread while you're at it. There's nothing to see here. (17 years ago, 12-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Tim David
|
| | | | | (...) Is that Lego's copyright? If so the image is still in its original location (URL) If not, well a copy was't made, anymore than any web surfing makes copies (i.e. download it to HD) (17 years ago, 12-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Matthew J. Chiles
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, that is a pretty good spot to look for pics of the new sets. Very cool, thanks for sharing. The giant rock set looks like a lot of fun, and ya gotta love blasting though a Nazi border on a motorcycle! Not to mention classic snakes and the (...) (17 years ago, 14-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Marc Nelson Jr.
|
| | | | | (...) Oh, man, is LUGNET going to be like FBTB or Classic-Castle.com now? Lame. Marc Nelson Jr. (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well, the policy of removing leaks was (I think) established for the first time in August of 2000: (URL) I'm not sure if there's an official stance is on modified versus cancelled posts, but that's Rene's call. DaveE (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) In otherwords, LUGNET is no place to take a leak. Dave! (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? — Rene Hoffmeister
|
| | | | | | (...) Hi Marc, would I have had a choice? What would you have made? Both German and US law doesn't differ in this point. -Rene (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Ted Godwin
|
| | | | (...) Nope. going by the format already used for other themes we need: lugnet.indianajones (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? — Rene Hoffmeister
|
| | | | (...) Could it be a subline of .adventurers? -Rene (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Ted Godwin
|
| | | | | (...) Only if you make .starwars a subline of .space. :) Just looking for consistency. (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Indiana Jones sets leaked? —Ken Dowd
|
| | | | (...) I'd argue against that. Although most people would agree that Indiana Jones was TLCs inspiration for the Adventurers theme, Indy is a licensed theme and not an adventurers subtheme. I would assign it lugnet.licensed.indianajones and then put a (...) (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.licensed, FTX)
|
| | | | |
