LEGO Direct : Search Results: wheel sets


LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / Search Results: wheel sets

Results 441 – 460 of about 1400.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: You get to choose!
(...) Well folk, just returned from voting (how could I resist!) and those are some "interesting" choices. Let me post here what my impressions as a 25+ year Fan-O-LEGO and an owner of what my wife calls,"too much LEGO": 1. Yellow Castle (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.260)

		Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!)
(...) Spoken like a collector without regard for what others may or may not have in their collections. I see this as a kind of greed on your part, pure and simple. Others, who for reasons of youth or having made different spending choices in the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.260)

		Re: You get to choose!
(...) Hello all...8^) My two bricks on the potential re-releases: 375 Yellow Castle Now here is a Legend choice. I can remember seeing it in the catalogs way back when and wishing I had it. Plus seeing the castle ideas in the old 6000 idea book and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.260)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) I agree. I would be really happy if someone would explain what the eBay offering is really about. (...) Isn't the actual number of 10 of these sets an even lower production run. ;) In all seriousness, I may not have described my theory (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) Well, actually no. The first instance of lego as a collectible would simply have been people keeping sets in a collectible condition (which has been going on for quite a while). Another previous instance of TLC marketing things in this manner (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: an alternate opinion
Well said! If I may add a few comments: (...) I'd like to chime in here to remind people that juniorization of LEGO System sets should not be confused with the introduction of the quick-build Jack Stone sets. JS sets allow LEGO to provide simpler (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) How did you determine these sales were due to the "limited" nature of the set, and not due to the excellent quality of the set? Once you have established that, suppose Lego were to release a "limited" set every month -- do you think the appeal (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
Allan Bedford wrote (...) First, as has been said, it's unlikely that the eBay offering is about money. Second, I'm not sure LEGO does production runs of anything for less than 10,000. Your suggested production run of 3,000 is way too small, I'd (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) I'm pretty sure it indicated a negative response as the top overall opinion. This in itself is disappointing as it makes you wonder who's getting and reading the data coming in from the polls. (...) Here's another spin on that very thought. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
I agree with you Suz, I don't like this idea. It's not like Lego doesn't make enough money selling through normal channels, why inflate the price of an item by auctioning it? If they start doing this with all sets, I have a feeling they are going to (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
It's almost impossible for me to skip over this debate(?) without saying something. Rick Clark has nailed this directly on the head. In my opinion he is 100% correct. What is so wrong about Lego Direct selling these 1-10 Santa Fe Trains, especially (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) I am quite confused by the overall reaction to this. I see what LD is doing as the perfect sales model to make both collecters and builders happy. They have even eliminated the dealers/scalpers for the good of us all. The builders can get as (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) I don't find it icky at all. I'm rather greatful to have an opportunity to buy one of the first numbered sets. What's wrong with that? KL (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) I think what they're trying to say is that "The locomotive does not come assembled as shown, but instead, one needs to build it in order to have the nice looking display model shown here." This is different from the stand/tracks, which come (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Going once, going twice, sold!
All, It is with great pleasure and enthusiasm that I announce the new LEGO Auctions! Check out the new area of the online LEGO Shop at (URL) have literally just launched this live, and the first auction will be ....drum roll please.... Santa Fe (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) Welcome back. (...) Me too. (although I sent a copy of MTW-4001 to the executives at Skyline Chili, I put #01 up for bid, just as I always do with new sets) (...) Exactly. The alternative that Rick gave of having some 7 year old get it would (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions - Super Chief
(...) I agree with you Kevin. Considering how much money LEGO lost up through 2000, I think they deserve a chance to make an economic comeback by any methods necessary. After all, they are a business, and the purpose of a business is to make money. (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) Well, I doubt Lego does do stuff like that... But I guess if he wanted to, the President could probablly snatch the 400+ dollars in revenue ONE of these Auctions would bring... (...) Aren't we all? :-) (...) Well in general, I have to agree. I (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
(...) From (URL) : "Train model assembly is required." So the box gets opened anyway (which to me seems a weird requirement, which is hard to verify) As for some 7 year old obtaining it, no matter how WE look at it, LEGO is at heart still a toy, (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

		Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
<snip> (...) I agree with you, Suz. There is an uneasy feeling in my stomach. The reason why is because throughout the years, despite feelings to the contrary, LEGO was always first and foremost about PLAYING. This is the first step towards LEGO as (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

sets
(score: 0.259)

More: Next Page >>