Subject:
|
Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Sep 2000 01:17:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1077 times
|
| |
 | |
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> writes:
> Chris Gray wrote:
>
> > Tom Stangl <toms@netscape.com> writes:
> >
> > > Well, the new Bulk pages already have a mistake - the 2x6 bricks use a
> > > picture of a 2x8 - wasn't that an OLD error that they never fixed? They
> > > had a perfect opportunity to fix it with the update, and blew it.
> >
> > Your browser cache might need flushing or something. I haven't visited
> > www.lego.com for a while, but did so just now. I see 2 x 8's for sale
> > with a picture of a 2 x 8, but no 2 x 6 picture or mention.
>
> Can you look at that again? http://www.lego.com/bulk/ - very first row, far
> right - green 2x8 BRICK pictured, yet the description under it (and on the
> left frame) is 2xSIX. (Black Item #3463, etc, etc)
Sorry, no, I can't. When I access it now, it tells me that I have to
accept a cookie, which I refuse to do. I guess I won't be visiting
the Lego site anymore, until they fix this bug.
Some of the folks having trouble getting the new stuff may be hitting
problems where the pages are being cached by a caching proxie or a
caching server that is part of their ISP or some intermediate network.
Such things are supposed to work properly, but if the source site is
unreachable, I expect the caching server would deliver the old data
rather than giving a failure to the request.
--
Don't design inefficiency in - it'll happen in the implementation.
Chris Gray cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA
http://www.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA/cg/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:  | | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
| (...) It's a bug that it doesn't work with some browsers even though they do accept cookies. And it's bad design for the site to not work at all without them. But it's not a bug. Cookies which are sent back to the original server only are a good (...) (25 years ago, 16-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
| (...) Can you look at that again? (URL) - very first row, far right - green 2x8 BRICK pictured, yet the description under it (and on the left frame) is 2xSIX. (Black Item #3463, etc, etc) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:   
    
  
      
            
                 
             
           
                      
                 
                 
            
            
          
             
      
      
          
    
   
       
     
     
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|