Subject:
|
Re: 2001 Set info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:49:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3224 times
|
| |
|
|
> Or, Lego could start at the source of the problem and ask Target to change
> their policies (or to formulate some -- my guess is that the actual case is
> that Target hasn't bothered with this issue at all).
The problem here is that target is so big that they could take action
against efforts by TLG to tell them how to run their stock systems or
whatever (e.g. discontinuing the sale of lego) and that would loose
sales for TLG.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) This cuts both ways, Target can't NOT sell Lego at all or they will lose sales too. However they can deemphasize it or cut shelf space for it (which seems to be happening at Target and Kmart at least) ++Lar (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Me too. But in this case, *Target* is the source of the leak. At this point, it's fair game. The only issue that comes into it for me is the one of respect for Lego. Out of respect for them, I personally will avoid posting data that I might (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
