 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —Kevin Knoot
| | | | (...) Todd, isn't the very existance of Lugnet a de facto advertisement for Lego, and isn't that a good thing? I mean, everyone here is a Lego consumer, by definition. AFOL: Adult Friend Of Lego. We all buy Legos. We all like building with Legos. We (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —David Eaton
| | | | | (...) I think the initial intent was to keep from being "strongarmed" by Lego into actually being a real commercial force. IE, ad banners, ONLY pro-Lego propaganda (no flames on TLC's business decisions, etc, like juniorization qualms), etc. Also, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | |
