 | | Re: Packaging Style (was:You get to choose!)
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Lou Zucaro writes: <snip> (...) Actually I like it. Now if someone has returned the set after opening it, or worse yet, opened and plundered it at the store, there is no question about it. Also those heavy duty cardboard boxes (...) (23 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging Style (was:You get to choose!)
|
|
(...) USC? I don't think I'm up on my acronyms. It's not the cardboard itself that I mind, but the fact that the box can't be re-closed to contain the pieces inside. (...) Well, LEGO started it with the whole "Use this box for storage" deal on the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging Style (was:You get to choose!)
|
|
(...) The UCS sets are a rotten example. Whoever designed the UCS Tie and X-Wing boxes should be strangled, hanged, and SHOT. Those are the flimsiest, most useless boxes I've seen out of Lego. They are double the size they need to be (and at half (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | 10018 & 10019 packed same as other UCS sets? (was:Packaging Style)
|
|
The subject tells all. I ask this in light of 10018 and 19 being sent to stores. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10018 & 10019 packed same as other UCS sets? (was:Packaging Style)
|
|
"Jeremy Scott" <Copyright@cox.net> wrote in message news:GutMwL.BGv@lugnet.com... (...) The RBR from S@H is in the same style large flimsy box as the UCS sets. I doubt they'd change much going to retail. Does the retail version have a coloured (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
