 | | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!) —Leonard Hoffman
| | | | <snip> (...) I agree with you, Suz. There is an uneasy feeling in my stomach. The reason why is because throughout the years, despite feelings to the contrary, LEGO was always first and foremost about PLAYING. This is the first step towards LEGO as (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!) —Kerry Raymond
| | | | | | (...) mint, (...) Since a true collector won't open the box, it follows that it doesn't matter what is in the box (because they will never know, as opening the box reduces its value). So to realise its value, the collector must believe without (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!) —Richard Marchetti
| | | | | (...) Well, actually no. The first instance of lego as a collectible would simply have been people keeping sets in a collectible condition (which has been going on for quite a while). Another previous instance of TLC marketing things in this manner (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | |
