 | | Re: announcing the "My Own Creation" series —Mark de Kock
|
| | | (...) No, don't license the Spamckae to LD. We won't be able to use it ourself. Most of my spaceships would have to swap engines, as their Spamcake-driven ones would be illegal then. But seriuosly, it would make a great set! Mark -what's that? (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: announcing the "My Own Creation" series —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | (...) Well, spamcake can be licensed AND you can end up winning: all you'd have to do was to replace the current generators with the ones working with anti-spamcake - GAMH has been working on them for a while now. For what I've understood, once they (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: announcing the "My Own Creation" series —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Markassius" <mark.de.kock@NOSPAM.home.nl> wrote in message news:GoGBrK.12G@lugnet.com... (...) You bring up a good point. I agree with you here. Thanks to Tom McDonald, Spamcake is now a community icon. I appreciate all LEGO Direct is doing to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: announcing the "My Own Creation" series —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | In lugnet.lego.direct, Tim Courtney writes: <<snippetysnip some thoughts that I share with Tim>> (...) Well, I feel that Spamcake is best left untouched..period! Everybody knows the dangers of handling Spamcake with remote controlled Mecha, watching (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: announcing the "My Own Creation" series —Daniel Siskind
|
| | | | In lugnet.lego.direct, Tim Courtney writes: (snip) (...) (snip) Does this mean I'll get crap if I have a the crew frying up a couple of slices on the radiator of the M10 Tank Destoryer kit I'm releasing next year? Dan (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
