| | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts Jonathan Mizner
|
| | (...) This is incredible. I have created a self-sustaining argument over Lego rights. This is actually, in a strange, twisted way, funny. I never thought that debates like this would carry over into Lugnet. And never intended to start a debate in (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts Jonathan Mizner
|
| | | | (...) This message is for any messages SUPPORTING Lego designs being traded freely, without any costs. Reply with your arguments here. (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts Jonathan Mizner
|
| | | | (...) This reply/thread is for the posting of messages from people who believe that everyone's creations are theirs only, and must be paid for. Please post your replies HERE. (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Why not take this over to .debate?? -Tim (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts Franklin W. Cain
|
| | | | | (...) What he said. :-/ Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) Because, as a LEGO issue, it's not "off-topic"? eric (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |