 | | CAD formats (was Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) One hopes for the latter but fears for the former. We have a licensing problem with the parts library, which we need to address, quickly, IMHO, or stumbling blocks of our own making could prevent TLC legal from approving use of the LDraw (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CAD formats (was Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G5561G.6xp@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) or (...) all (...) or (...) the (...) It would be great if somehow TLC worked with the LCAD community to develop this software, and allowed (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CAD formats (was Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) The licensing issue doesn't matter, except for appearances/impressions (having a 'licensing issue' gives the impression that we might not play well with LEGO). LEGO doesn't need the LDraw parts library, they've got their own parts database. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
