 | | Re: You get to choose!
|
|
(...) Yepee! (...) I'd put a buck if I could... helàs, I can only vote once. Off to vote now, 6390 come to daddy! Pedro (very, very happy - thank you LEGO!!!!) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | You get to choose!
|
|
Working for LEGO Direct is always fun, but every once in a while a project comes along that just makes me giddy when I get to come here and announce it. Today, such an announcement is made. We would like to invite you all to choose our next LEGO (...) (22 years ago, 11-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.lego.announce) !!
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
(...) That's not correct. The document just says that you have a limited edition, not what number. And the stickers are not personalized. There is a *printed* tile that is personalized, however, with a unique number from 1 to 9999 for each set. (...) (22 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
(...) This is very true. However, the REAL concept of the Limited Edition has to be taken into consideration. The example you gave is not a "real" limited edition. Sure, there were only a few dozen of the same design made. That is true. But the real (...) (22 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
[snip] (...) I would disagree here. With the good part assortment in hard to get colors, that background would no doubt sell very well. Not to display the engine but to cannibalize for parts. (I know Allan, you do not buy just for the sake of parts. (...) (22 years ago, 10-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
(...) I agree. I would be really happy if someone would explain what the eBay offering is really about. (...) Isn't the actual number of 10 of these sets an even lower production run. ;) In all seriousness, I may not have described my theory (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
(...) Well, actually no. The first instance of lego as a collectible would simply have been people keeping sets in a collectible condition (which has been going on for quite a while). Another previous instance of TLC marketing things in this manner (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
(...) How did you determine these sales were due to the "limited" nature of the set, and not due to the excellent quality of the set? Once you have established that, suppose Lego were to release a "limited" set every month -- do you think the appeal (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Nice Work, Jake!
|
|
Jake, you have achieved the status in my mind of "master minifig scale train builder"! I really like the way you put a train together:-) This loco: (URL) is certainly in league with the Super Chief or even *beyond* it! Hey Brad! You've got your next (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
(...) mint, (...) Since a true collector won't open the box, it follows that it doesn't matter what is in the box (because they will never know, as opening the box reduces its value). So to realise its value, the collector must believe without (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this look familiar?
|
|
(...) Strangely enough, their websites look similar too. Except MegaBlocks graph paper background is more useful, since it's broken into brick/3 plates layering... (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this look familiar?
|
|
(...) I assume that that's sarcasim, right? Poor lego! (Or more correctly stupid Lego!) :-) John Kruer (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this look familiar?
|
|
(...) ROSCO (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this look familiar?
|
|
(...) No resemblance: (URL) Clark (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
Allan Bedford wrote (...) First, as has been said, it's unlikely that the eBay offering is about money. Second, I'm not sure LEGO does production runs of anything for less than 10,000. Your suggested production run of 3,000 is way too small, I'd (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this look familiar?
|
|
(...) Hoooo-eeee! That's not just a model made of Megabloks, it's an *official* Megabloks model. Looks like Lego's been stung again... :) Perhaps they should enlist a couple of judges from LUGNET, at least we seem to be able to recognize the real (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this look familiar?
|
|
(...) I think they're Mega Blocks. The copter looks alot like a Megablock one. And one of the rules were 'no representation of competing products.' John Kruer (22 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this look familiar?
|
|
I do think they look like clone bricks. LEGO doesn't make an olive green. Jake? Anyone? -Tim (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO spammed me
|
|
I got the same e-mail ("LEGO Santa Fe Super Chief #'s 1-5 at eBay!") 6 times. Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable man persists in attempting to adapt his (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure it indicated a negative response as the top overall opinion. This in itself is disappointing as it makes you wonder who's getting and reading the data coming in from the polls. (...) Here's another spin on that very thought. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
