 | | Re: General session Q&A —Kevin Salm
|
| | | (...) ~~snip~~ It is NOT my intention or goal to be negative. TLC does NOT need my help to ruin their brand image. They have proven they can do it all by themselves. As evidence, TLC threw out a perfectly good 25-year old trademark when they stopped (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: General session Q&A —Gregory Muri
|
| | | | That is just it Kevin, nobody at Lego got any sense. They just responded to the one and only thing that corporate robots instantly respond to. The loss of money, especially on the scale that Lego did last year, is a powerful thing. It will likely (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General session Q&A —John M. Rudy
|
| | | | (...) See... I disagree with you on this point. The poor sales of 2004 will have nothing to do with color change. We, the AFOLs may cease buying because of this fact, but that is a drop in the bucket of problems, a mere 5% loss in a world of hurt (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: General session Q&A —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) a few idle remarks from the peanut gallery Many (most ?) AFOLs buy at clearance. Because certain AFOLs stop buying at clearance, doesn't mean that the stuff will just sit there and go unsold forever. Some clearanced stuff moves back up the (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| | | | |
