| |
In lugnet.general, Scott Arthur wrote:
> Jake can you clarify this? I expect ‘support’ and use of the word “lego” in
> the url has been given subject to assurances or limitations with regard the
> content of the site.
Actually not. What we _have_ discussed is to make it possible for parents to
decide that some classes of content is unsuitable for their children, and for
users of the site to decide some age limits for access to content/discussion
groups they create. The implementation is not fixed yet, but I hope we will get
around to publish the current specification soon.
> If possible, I’d be interested to know what those
> assurances or limitations are. For instance, will
> users see:
>
> a) ‘controversial’ content (or links to it)? (The
> work of Brendan Powell Smith comes to mind.)
Yes (if they want to).
> b) condemning reviews of new & upcoming lego product lines or sets?
Yes (unless LEGO starts improving the quality of their sets and lowering their
prices :-).
I doubt that we would accept that LEGO imposed editorial limits on the site.
Then I would at least prefer to go elsewhere for sponsorships.
Play well,
Jacob (not Jake :-)
--
City X'ers delivery van (building instructions):
http://jacob.sparre.dk/CityXers/Kassevogn/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
