Subject:
|
Re: The Future of Trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:33:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
22821 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.lego, Ben Fleskes wrote:
|
In lugnet.lego, Reinhard Ben Beneke wrote:
snip
|
I even would guess that a special sleeper plate with flat bottom (to float
on studs beneath), with 242 studs on top and a kind of retaining clips to
fix the metal rail would be an option for any third-party producer. BBB?
Little Armory? We would surly need hundreds of these. On the other hand we
would not like to pay 3 bucks per piece, but only 10% of this...
I would not care about another 3rd party piece. If lego cuts the support I
do not mind to throw my purism over board.
Leg Godt,
|
Ive looked at this and a few similar options. Wether or not BBB could
achieve it at the $0.30 per piece range (preferably less) is a matter of
quantity. Id much prefer to be closer to $0.10 per piece. But in order to
get that low, Im thinking of production runs up to 100,000 parts and I dont
know if the demand would be there. Especially not knowing what LEGO will do.
The other aspect to this is that you are basically talking about a new
system of track and I dont think you could just make the sleepers (ie
ties) without making the other necessary parts - switches, crossings etc.
and there in lies the crux of the problem. You cant just engineer one part
of a track system, you need to work out a whole system of track that will
play well together.
And investing in a whole system of track would require a lot of upfront cost
which may be made entirely obsolete by what LEGO will release in 2009. It
just doesnt seem feasible to do the necessary R&D, release a product and
make the investment back.
Cheers,
Ben Fleskes
Big Ben Bricks LLC
|
Hi Ben,
I do not see so much need for a full system: the biggest need is for straight
track and possibly new curve radius.
The aftermarket will offer used 9V switches for the next 20 years. Some people
will switch to the new battery trains. Kids will give up their small train
systems anyway.... But clubs and hard core users will allways have the need for
a new curve radius and more straight track.
But of course this limits the mass of sleepers, which can be marketed.
The only extra part, which might be needed in fact, is a connection between
standard 9V track and the mentioned sleeper+rail track.
But to be honest: I am not a strong potential custumer of such sleepers anyway.
At the very same moment when the first pictures of the actual battery trains
came up, I have begun to enlarge my pile of track and spare 9V motors. Unluckily
these are made in a rather poor quality in copmparison to 90ies motors (LEGO has
reduced the specification for the guaranteed operation time to 33% of the
original value). Nevertheless I will never ever in my life need any more 9V
equipment. My track is enough to put 2 ovals around the house and even if I burn
2 motors per year, I will be 70+ of age before my spares are used up....
This is the reason, why I am not personally hit by the demise of 9V trains. Of
course it is sad, to make a public show and display classic sets of a glorious
LEGO past.
9V leg godt!
See more pictures of my models at www.brickshelf.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| Again I may be missing something, and perhaps the future of LEGO's solution, as yet unknown looms as a possible roadblock--but why for example could not the various train clubs come up with a standard piece--get together--gurantee a certain number (...) (17 years ago, 7-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| In lugnet.lego, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: <snip> (...) I've looked at this and a few similar options. Wether or not BBB could achieve it at the $0.30 per piece range (preferably less) is a matter of quantity. I'd much prefer to be closer to $0.10 (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
124 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|