 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) 1x8s instead of 2x8s, and spaced every other-- more prototypical that way. In any event, well done, Kenn! JOHN (19 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) [...] (...) Well, I guess at least we now don't have to worry about if or when the 9v line will be discontinued. Like some of you, I am upset. I am upset that LEGO marketed the 9v line so poorly, but I also suspect that in the current (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) An AFOL already made some headway on that one, way back in '05.. (URL) (19 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Well, simple straights and curves could easily be made with flexible rails and individual ties, but many of the specialized track pieces that seem to be of real interest to the hobby are complex crossovers and points. Those would require (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Scott pretty much summed up my concern over this one. Get a commercial entity involved, and you're in danger of crossing the line for patent infringement. I doubt they'd ever go after Ondrew for his hand-modded track (indeed, since he uses (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
|
