 | | Re: The Future of Trains —Scott Wardlaw
| | | | As a Senior Engineering Analyst, I understand facts, figures, and numbers. If a department reports low sales on something, that may indicate that a product of that department should be cut in order for the company as a whole to be profitable. (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Jonathan Wilson
| | | | | | The simple fact is that no matter what products are on the shelf or how good (or crap) the design is, trains that get their power from the track (ala 9V) will ALWAYS be more expensive than a matching train that takes battery power (rechargeable or (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —Scott Lyttle
| | | | | | | (...) Also, Add Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) rules that anything using AC power means minimum age 7 on the box, and with Duplo going around age 5, that means a gap in trains from age 5 to 7. The new battery train has a lower age range (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Future of Trains —David Laswell
| | | | | (...) *coughBIONICLEcough* Ok, granted, it rarely involves face-to-face interaction on the same level as more AFOL-friendly themes, but it still counts. (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | |
