Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 13:13:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12559 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
>
> <snip>
SNIP
> As Dave just stated--there was no 'word' given--just the statement of facts that
> at the time were perfectly correct. Those that can adapt to changes evolve--we
> should be supporting TLC in this endeavour wholeheartedly due to the simple fact
> that they are doing something completely right for their financial side, as well
> as for the AFOL community. But nope, we're here griping about semantics and
> misread or misinterpreted events and calling on 'morals'--230ish posts going
> 'round and 'round.
SNIP
> Dave K
230 proves that it's not as cut and dry as you'd like it to be. This is another
bad decision that will alienate more customers and financialy they can not
afford to be doing so.
With a little thought a new supply of Maersk blue ABS could have been a godsend.
Instead they put no thought into it, took back their word (or changed the facts)
with regard to limited and further dissapointed everyone who was dragged into
the vote for the new color ship.
Ailienating customers is never "compleatly right for thier financial side".
Ken
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote: <snip> (...) I forgot all about this ine--TLC can't win one way or the other. Nice catch Larry and Dave. (...) As Dave just stated--there was no 'word' given--just the statement of facts that at the time were (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
