 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) And that, right there, probably best sums up why you are meeting with so much disagreement. You believe that without TLC, your hobby ends, despite the collection of LEGO I assume you must already have, and despite a very extensive after-market (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) You know what, at this point if I was head of marketting at TLC I would pull the new run from S@H and only supply them to Maersk. That'd make money for the company AND save their integrity (1). ROSCO (1) As percieved by a small number of AFOLs (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| In lugnet.lego, Scott Lyttle wrote: <snip> (...) I would only ever make as many shirts as a customer would want:-) (...) Well, at this point, I, as the producer for the group would be totally out of the loop. (...) I'm not sure a situation involving (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) Ha! Clearly you haven't been reading all my posts. I think I get the most annoyed with people who leap to conclusions about things they shouldn't. They said that ONE phrase that was incorrect, and you and others jump down Lego's throat. They (...) (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Missed opportunities (was: A Community Problem)
|
| (...) Wow Larry, you missed a perfect opportunity for a footnote! (...) And a sub-footnote opportunity missed no less! That's not like you at all! Wink. ROSCO (22 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
