 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) John, I really don't understand this point. I mean that literally, I don't understand. You may very well be right within this odd-sounding (to me) corner of the collector world. But personally, I fail to see how a simple set (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) All this attitude does is tell Lego that when they make a cool set for a corporate client, they are better off not offering it to the general public. Luckily for the sane amongst us, the public in general doesn't have this attitude. So the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) Amen, And thank you William, Another voice of reason. Let the collectors cry all they want. As I said, Kudos to TLC for taking Mearsk's money and making a profit. Oh, the collectors don't want that happening. WELL TO DAMN BAD. Steven Weiser (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: One last Spring Cleaning set
|
|
(...) Is that what you get when you cross Tuesday and Thursday? (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Johannes Koehler wrote: ... While on the other (...) I applaud any effort by TLC to spoil the efforts of speculators to profit from the scarcity of a set. I wish they would rerelease monorail, Classic Space, and a bunch of other (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) I think it's incredible that LEGO gives any attention to AFOL's at all. Now you want them to give special attention to the minority who are collectors? You don't ask much, do you? It's great that LEGO has made this set available again. And (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update: What has TLC to do to bring YOU up against them?
|
|
(...) Fact # 1: I have yet to see anyone produce the "PROMISE" that TLC gave. Fact # 2: I am one of those who IS very upset with the change to the colors. I have not spent one penny on new sets, nor will I any time soon. Old sets and parts will be (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) I agree with you Jonathan. Anyone who buys Lego as an investment should look elsewhere to invest. I own 10 copies of 6390 Main Street. Then 20 years later they re-release it. Was I mad? No, TLG never said that old sets would not be (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update: What has TLC to do to bring YOU up against them?
|
|
(...) To be honest, I could care less about what the company does. This is a hobby for me. What this means is that I refuse to let anything LEGO stress me out. In other words, I'll praise the company when they do something I like and ignore (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update: What has TLC to do to bring YOU up against them?
|
|
In lugnet.lego, René Hoffmeister wrote: Dear René, thanks for bringing these postings into the debate. Facts are: LEGO gave a promise and broke it (because they think they can generate profit out of this decision). Fact number 2 is: lots of people (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
