 | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
| In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Forgot to crosspost to .direct ++Lar (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: lego software
|
| "eric shumacher" <reckling@concentric.net> wrote in message news:G875Kn.1Ew@lugnet.com... (...) Is this some sort of elaborate prank? I apologize for my skepticism but I don't recognize your name in connection with LEGO, and I haven't found it (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
| (...) Awesome! (...) Ohohoo, when you say "the future of the product line," I assume you are referring to trains? If so, that sounds very encouraging! Can you say whether rumors of the train product line's demise are greatly exaggerated? Will be any (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I am happy to hear trains will be around. I would like to know why the female part of this group was left out. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.:((((( Rose (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| |
|
