 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Well thank you Lego. This is the final nail in the coffin. Changing the grey's and brown colours, killing the 9v trains. The least you could have done was keep up with the exchange rate on the Canadian dollar. No excuses like "There may be (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| Alright, I think that most of us could buy into a new system of trains, if the right conditions were met. Absolutely must have conditions: 1) Enough torque in each motor to pull at least 10 cars 2) Compact component(s) that do not inhibit creativity (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| As a Senior Engineering Analyst, I understand facts, figures, and numbers. If a department reports low sales on something, that may indicate that a product of that department should be cut in order for the company as a whole to be profitable. (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| Well, since it is Oct. 1, 2007 today. I have decided to write-off 2008 as a DEAD year for LEGO trains. The question now is when in 2009 is the 'new' system gonna be released or when will 'we' AFOL's see pictures, set numbers and prices etc. I have (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Let see key needs for a new system. The ability to plug it in. No seriously, they should use the new wireless power transfer technology that is starting to get some serious attention in Popular Mechanics and other such publications. Frankly if (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
|
