 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) While this is a disappointment due to the significant investment in the 9V system I made over the past few years...I am very excited to see what direction TLG is going to take with the Power Function trains. I am very excited that they are (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Something that doesn't require *dozens* of batteries to have a display with a few operating trains for a weekend. (/cry/) Small size motors, for smaller MOCs. The existing 9volt train motor is a good size. Ability to have more than one motor (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Well, this is something of a blow to the LTC's doing shows. If the decision has been made to discontinue the line and work on a replacment, let us be proactive, and indicate the positives of the 9V system that should be worked into a new (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| At last we now know why our concerns over 9v trains were never on the original LEGO Ambassadors’ Official “Issues” List. I've known the writing was on the wall for a long time now, but even with that knowledge the blow wasn't any less hard to me. As (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) It does not make sense in strictly monetary terms for TLG to continue to produce a line that is not directly profitable. However, we have raised the point before that numerous intangible benefits arise from the 9V Train line. Community (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.trains) !
|
|
